Research and editorial responsibility

Zero Trace Water Research Team

The team reviews public-water-system identities, PWSIDs, utility reports, state and federal records, ZIP-level research links and treatment claims for KentuckyWaterFiltration.com.

Editorial safeguards

What the team will not claim without evidence

No citywide exposure assumptions

A utility result does not prove the same condition at every household, and a ZIP code does not establish the water supplier.

No unsupported treatment promises

Reduction claims must be tied to the complete model, contaminant, standard, capacity and maintenance conditions.

No invented local presence

The regional site does not fabricate offices, phone numbers, employees, licenses, ratings or reviews.

No hidden corrections

Material corrections are documented through the corrections page and reflected in the page’s reviewed date.

Evergreen review cadence

Methodology and editorial-policy pages use an 18–24 month routine review window.

Earlier review occurs when a material error, major regulatory change, public-water-system change or business-process change affects the guidance. City pages keep separate reviewed dates because providers, PWSIDs, reports and links can change independently.

Source order

How the team ranks evidence

  1. Current water bill and exact service address
  2. Current utility Consumer Confidence Report
  3. Kentucky Drinking Water Watch and Division of Water records
  4. EPA SDWIS, ECHO, UCMR and service-area datasets
  5. Kentucky WRIS and utility infrastructure sources
  6. Independent comparisons such as EWG, clearly labeled
  7. Property-specific certified laboratory testing